Why Hillary Clinton Deserves The Black Vote

She humbled herself, giving up White Privilege-to not only win-but succeed once in office by continuing Obama’s policies.

by Theron K. Cal aka The Real Brother

Clinton & Obama


“Fifty percent of Whites will vote for the Republican and fifty percent for the Democrat… while Blacks decide who wins” ~Malcolm X

While the above quote is a paraphrase of the iconic Black activists plea to get Blacks to take our vote more seriously-its a refrain that can be echoed today as we seek to determine the course of a Nation dumbfounded by the success of its first African-American(yes he’s Black, sorry there’s no such thing as biracial), President.

Author Michelle Alexander published a piece in the Nation Magazine detailing why she feels Hillary Clinton should not get the Black vote. I beg to differ and write this article to address the points Alexander raised-in making my argument that Hillary has earned our vote and will be the 45th President of the United States baring an unspeakable tragedy.

Democratic politicians making black people feel liked and taken seriously. Doing something concrete to improve the conditions under which most black people live is generally not required. ” ~Michelle Alexander

While I can’t argue-prior to Obama’s election-the above was not true, I will argue that it worked because for as lame as Democratic outreach to Black voters was, it was ten times better than Republican outreach-which was a [big fat]middle finger. As Blacks we don’t want any group to take our votes for granted, but giving our vote to Republicans as reward for hating our guts is much worse.

“…Bill Clinton seemed to get us. When Toni Morrison dubbed him our first black president, we nodded our heads. We had our boy in the White House. Or at least we thought we did.” ~Michelle Alexander

I disagree both with Mrs Alexander & Morrison. The idea that Blacks can only accept Bill Clinton if we think he’s Black is insulting if not asinine. For as much as Black women would want and expect Black men to hate White people for four-hundred and fifty years of Slavery, Racism, Discrimination & Oppression based on our race, we don’t.

If we want to accept and embrace Whites who show a sincere interest in our race and culture it doesn’t mean we think Eminem is Black. Clinton acknowledged aspects of our Culture-including some that would lead to his impeachment-that the brothers admired and we need not apologize or be insulted for that.

Would now be a good time to bring up the fact that what Bill Clinton did had nothing to do with Hillary? Sure she was his wife and yes she was White and I’ll even grant she thinks-as all Whites do-that Blacks are degenerate, inferior and nobody Black will ever be President-if they do somehow luck up and get elected they won’t succeed.

Should Hillary lie to Blacks to get our vote?

Alexander goes on to mention Bill Clinton’s Three Strikes legislation and disproportionate sentencing for Black offenders as opposed to Whites committing the same offense. I concede that these policies were supported in speeches by Hillary, who I truly believe supported them wholeheartedly.

That said, Hillary would pay for her beliefs in 2008 when she put them to the test in her battle with then Senator Barack Obama. To argue that she’s the same person who thinks Whites superior and Black men “Super Predators” after being soundly defeated by Obama is to be dishonest.

Hillary was asked by Chris Hayes of MSNBC why she didn’t handle the email server thing better-she knew she was running for President? When she answered, “No, I hadn’t decided whether or not I was running for President”  You could see the smirk on Hayes’ face.

Hayes assumes Hillary knew she was running and is once again being less than honest. A charge, which is at the heart of the fake scandals the White-98% Conservative owned media-is saying is her number one flaw.

I look at it another way. If in fact Hillary believed in the myth of White supremacy and that nobody Black could beat her and become President.  Would she be able to maintain that belief if she wanted to run again-after the Black President who beat her, becomes the most successful in U.S. History?

So yes no question, Hillary contemplated running for President but she’d have to abandon the White supremacist beliefs that cost her in 08′, beliefs that her entire life to this point had been based on.  Giving up White Privilege is not a decision anyone White- especially democratic royalty gives up lightly.

“This time she’s facing a democratic socialist who promises a political revolution that will bring universal healthcare, a living wage, an end to rampant Wall Street greed, and the dismantling of the vast prison state—many of the same goals that Martin Luther King Jr. championed at the end of his life. Even so, black folks are sticking with the Clinton brand.”

This is a meme being played out in our media and it speaks to how insulting White people can be. Just as our embrace of Bill Clinton wasn’t because we thought he was Black, its because he reached out to Blacks when very few Whites and no White Republicans have or do.

That Bernie Sanders is playing on the same myth of White Supremacy that Hillary had to abandon to gain the support of President Obama, is not the same thing as President Obama beating Hillary because she thought she could win simply by being White.

“Yes, but James Earl Ray marched with Dr. King too it doesn’t mean you get to trick Blacks into making you President” ~RB

Just as Black voters found in 2008 that Hillary was lying so too will Black voters find out about Bernie. In his victory speech after his win in New Hampshire he said some amazing things like;

“We have to get big money out of elections…now if you’ll excuse me-I have to raise another $100 million dollars.” ~Bernie Sanders

Or this one: “I’m going to Tax the top 1%, but yes your taxes will go up too” ~Bernie Sanders

The CBO scored Single Payer health care when they scored the Affordable Care Act. Obama submitted Hillary’s, Hillarycare proposal for comparison. The plan-which is being championed by Sanders-has been scored to cost $2 Trillion Dollars in Tax Payer funds(CBO) Bernie’s response? “You’ll save thousands...”

You heard that right, you pay; TWO TRILLION but you save “thousands” sounds like a great plan(not really).

Yes again that’s Bernie’s plan but the Republicans are even worse. Ted Cruz won the Iowa Caucus, in his victory speech said; “Obamacare actually hurts people on the bottom[by encouraging them to get into the middle class].” ~Ted Cruz

“The issue is; should we demand Hillary lie to us to prove to us that she deserves our vote? I say no. I say if she lies she’ll lose again.” ~RB

Alexander spends the rest of her article chronicling how Bill Clinton’s, Whites are Superior Blacks are degenerate & inferior policies hurt Black people-as an argument for why we should accept Bernie lying to us-because he thinks Blacks are inferior Whites are Superior.

I reject the notion that because Hillary is convinced her policies of the past were wrong that she’s less qualified than Bernie-who doesn’t realize his policies have been tried by the first failed 43 White presidents and certainly wouldn’t work in the age of Obama.

Hillary doesn’t have to tell us she knows her husbands policies were wrong, only that she will follow Obama’s policies which corrected those-not only of her husband-but of the Republican presidents trying to take their Country back[to 1850].

Finally, I said in 2008 that Obama would make it look so easy-every White son of a Bush would think they can be President. I also said they don’t realize Obama won because he had a; 1)Better Argument. Wasn’t a, 2) racist or supremacist and he wasn’t a 3)Liar.

We can have a debate as to why someone traumatized by Obama in defeat would be more apt to follow his lead than someone who thinks he’s “corrupt” because certainly he couldn’t have won if he wasn’t.

Sanders rails on the Donor Class and how these banks and Wall Street firms control our elections implying Obama’s on the take and so is Hillary. The facts tell a different story.

In 2008 Obama got twenty percent of his campaign contributions from Banks and Wall Street firms.  As President getting 5.7 Trillion Dollars in principle, interest, fines, fees & penalties. Including but not limited to: $16.65 Billion, Bank of America(bought Country Wide) $13 Billion, J.P. Morgan, $25 Billion, Wells Fargo($300 million to Black homeowners in a settlement with the bank and Obama basher Tavis Smiley). Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, USB, HSBC all were fined(Wall Street Journal).

The argument that taking money from banks and Wall Street resulting in sweet heart deals and no jail time-especially when only $7 Billion was recovered from Bernie Maddoff is a very weak argument.

Alexander concludes her argument suggesting she knows how it all turns out, the superior Whites win and Blacks lose. That we need a revolution such like the one Bernie Sanders offers. I totally disagree.

Shame on us to cynically look at Barack Obama’s rise to power as diminished because no blood was shed to enact the change of power(though the four-thousand Blacks Bush left to drown during Hurricane Katrina played a major part). Does a revolution not count if thousands of people don’t die for the cause?

If the losers of the debate concede they aren’t superior and accept following the policies of the victor is the only path to success does that mean we’ve failed?

The winner of the 2016 election will have the same qualities as Obama with the exception of his race and gender. By understanding the only path to victory-and success once in office-Hillary has proven she not only deserves our vote-she does our vote proud.

Those are my thoughts as usual I invite yours.

 PLEASE: Support Media Supports Hillary #Donate8 Here: Payments By PayPal

Follow me on Twitter:  RBRNet12@Twitter

Watch & Subscribe on YouTube  RBR Network@YouTube


©Copyright 2016 RBR Network Inc.







Sorry Rick Banks Bruh, You’re WRONG!!!

 Real Brother here.

Stanford Professor and author Rick Banks has been making a splash with his new book and wildly ridiculous claims that the solution to the problem of black self-hatred and blacks buying into the myth of white genetic superiority is more black self-hatred and more buying into the myth of white genetic superiority. You can find a video of Professor Banks’ argument here;  http://www.aol.com/video/youve-got-rick-banks/517193196?a_dgi=aolshare_twitter

I’d like to take Professor Banks to task for his ridiculously faulty argument as he lays it out in the video linked above. 1)Banks correctly states the problem that blacks are the least likely to marry and that seventy-eight percent of black children are born to and are living with single parents usually their single mother and or her extended family.

This is where Professor Banks’ argument begins to deteriorate into fallacy and nonsense. Banks makes the wild and ridiculous assumption that the ninety percent of black women who are not married to a black man are justified by the inherent and willing inferiority and deficiency of black men. This assumption is asinine because we need only look to the overwhelming marriages of black men to white and Asian women as evidence that dispels the lie that the deficiencies in black men are why black women are justified in not marrying them.

All available data on the two to one number of black men that date and marry outside of the black race shows that a higher level of education as well as a substantially higher income and social status is the chief factor making white and Asian women more likely to marry a black man than a black woman would. Banks’ argument while in part is correctly based on the seventy-percent of black women who reported on the 2000 and 2010 Census that they were single is faulty because he makes the silly assumption that the seventy percent of black women who are single are so because they simply refuse to date outside of the black race.

This reasoning is ridiculous because the seventy-eight percent  of children born to or living with single black women were fathered by in most cases a black man. If black men are so unsuitable for black women then why are these black women having their babies by these black men? The answer is simple and obvious; black women don’t have a problem with black men as much as they do with being married period. Again, seventy-percent of black women reported to the Census that they were single and prefer to stay that way. And let’s be honest, we must factor in the high number of black lesbian women who while still being women; want and do have children but have little more use for black or any man.

Another faulty argument Professor Banks makes is that because some or even disproportionately high numbers of black men were raised by single black man hating black women and as such are incarcerated and or under educated or otherwise deemed unmarriable by black women that this means President Obama and or Professor Banks are also unsuitable for marriage. One of the most tragic notions in the black community is that somebody over there isn’t right so that means all black men aren’t. If indeed black women are judging all black men based on these racist stereotypes advanced by black lesbians and or white racists then shame on us as a society.

Professor Banks concludes that black women can and should  blackmail black men into turning white or into women by forcing their hand by selling out with white and or Asian men. This is the most silly assumption he makes as the hatred of black men by ninety-percent of black women and this belief that whites are superior is a chief factor in why black men and women don’t marry one another. If anything a moratorium on sellout self-hating black behavior is in order as opposed to higher doses of the very hatred that is so much of the problem.

Indeed if the seventy-percent of black women who remain single and or dating or marrying lesbians wouldn’t shock black men into flocking to marry black women then why  would we assume that selling out with white or Asian men would? These games are again much more a part of the problem then they would be a solution to it. I question the very notion that men can simply hit a black woman over the head and drag her into a cave and make her be his wife. Women choose and no amount of trying to trick or force black men on black women who ninety percent of whom simply hate black men will succeed.

While the prescription of more black self-hatred and more blind worship of whites as superior will sell more books and get Professor Banks multiple television appearances at a time when white racists like Pat Buchanan and Rush Limbaugh express their fear that a black family in the White House will erode the myth of white genetic superiority its still highly irresponsible and wrong as a fix for the problems in the black community. I would hope that the publicity that Professor Banks has received can lead to some honest discussion about the riff between black men and women and if that happens then I can’t be mad at the Proffesor. 


Theron K. Cal is a Writer and Political Commentator who hosts The Real Brother Radio Show weekdays on U-Stream http://www.ustream.tv/user/Realbrother0003/videos



White Liberals Hold Obama 2 Higher Standard?




Real Brother Here.

While I applaud Mellisa Harris-Perry for finally addressing these so called “Progressives” who are angry with President Obama for not being the Slave that they thought they elected, I must take issue with her argument that White Progressives have set an arbitrarily high and therefore unachievable standard for a Black President. This is false. In fact the opposite is true.  You can read the entire article here http://bit.ly/og8C4B

My problem with getting the motivation for White Liberals abandoning President Obama wrong is it can do serious damage to his re-election if Whites are comforted by knowing that we were wrong in thinking they pulled their support from the President because of high standards when in fact he’s done too much and made White Presidents seem as mere mortals. If we get it right their shame and guilt would possibly make them think twice about destroying this Country because a Black President exceeded their low ball expectations.

Joy Reid of  The Grio wrote a companion piece to Harris-Perry’s,you can read that one here http://bit.ly/q5fYtw missing the same point that Whites don’t have HIGH expectations for Black people and get quite upset when Blacks don’t adhere to their Racist stereotypes of us. I offer as proof that Whites don’t have HIGH expectations for President Obama;  Chris Matthews quote:  “I want to see LESS INTELLIGENCE from this [Black]President and more fight” As in more angry Black man stereotypes. And then we had Andrea Mitchell in her very last interview ever with Valerie Jarrett who casually remarked that the President knows he’s the smartest guy in the room to which Mitchell quipped: “That’s arrogant, he’s arrogant”.  The comments about the President being “weak” and “caving” and “giving in” etc. I’d even offer that the Public Option flap and the Bush Tax Cut silliness are like the 57 States Myth.  These comments don’t portend of a HIGHER standard but to the belief held by 99.9% of Whites that Blacks are simply INFERIOR.  Whites resent Pres. Obama not living up to that LOW standard. They resent the Presidents intellect because as they said in my favorite movie A Soldiers Story, “Black folks are only supposed to have but so much sense”.

So in conclusion if we are going to address White Supremacy and Racism let’s not get it wrong because Whites are going to simply tune us out. Its better to get it right and then there will be nothing they can say. President Obama has written these White Progressives off he had to. He knows if he makes a better argument then whichever Racist he faces he skates to re-election. The last thing the President needs to do is try to dumb himself down to fit these stupid Racist stereotypes just to make White people feel Superior. The truth of the matter is they’d respect the President more by thumbing his nose at their stupidity then if he were to play dumb just to please em’.




Theron K. Cal is a  Writer and Commentator who Hosts Real Brother Radio on U-stream.

(c) 2011 Theron K. Cal ALL Rights Reserved

The Backwords World of Datetechguy

Real Brother here.

I was unaware of the Huffington Post piece by Cynthia Kounaris where she argues that the first Black President had to be fail proof, intelligent, well spoken etc. so that racists wouldn’t be able destroy him ending any and all hope of another African-American President. Her premise is spot on and while over 99.9% of Whites who supported Barack Obama had no idea he’d be as good as he turned out to be that basic premise that the first had to be exceptional which played a large part in the selection of Obama was accurate.

The blogger Datetechguy took exception to Kournaris’ article not only in the premise that President Obama is unshakable because he was in part chosen to be but also in the real aim of the article which is that the first female President has to be equally fortified and infallible which according to the Huff Post piece excludes Michelle Bachman and Sarah Palin. Datatech who’s as racist as the rest of the Tea Party and GOP Conservatives sighted the 80+ point approval rating that the racist Palin had in racist ass Alaska before McCain insulted women by tapping her unqualified behind to cost the GOP the 08′ Election.

Datetechguy then touted Bachman’s winning every unopposed election in her racist ass  District in the State of Minnesota. Where DateTech fails is in touting the popularity of racists among racists, he doesn’t address the issue of competency and in fact is implying that racism is indeed the only measure of competency that should be considered. DateTech even suggested that Bachman won the debate in a room full of idiots where the bar was so low a two year old baby midget could have skipped over it.

Datetech guy offered this bit of nonsense: “And tell me Cynthia how is it that in Wisconsin that went the route Palin fought in person, is generating surpluses while California going the Obama way is losing Amazon?” Stupid because Wisconsin was a joke and the recall elections will prove that the racist Governor lied his way into office and  his actions were an assault on the middle class. California had a Republican Governor who applied Palin’s policies and damn near bankrupted the State and Amazon is based in Seattle and that’s Washington State not California.

Datetechguy ends his blog article with the claim that Blacks don’t support President Obama because Velma Hart said she was “tired” of defending a Black President against White racists who hate him because he’s Black. Datetech even argued that when racists at Fox post pictures of Obama as a monkey and his parents as Apes and Glenn Beck or Palin encourage racists like Jerrod Loughner to “Shoot them in the forehead” that the Obama Administration calls up the racists at fox to complain. This of course proves that Obama is not worthy of being the first Black President that maybe someone who hates the Black Race and worships Whites as much as the racists in the Tea Party do say Herman Cain or OJ Simpson[Flava Flav] would be a better choice. Yea right.


Theron K. Cal is a writer and filmmaker and can be followed on Twitter @Realbrother0003

(c) 2011 Theron K. Cal Presents ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Cornell West, Joan Walsh etc.

Real Brother here.

I feel compelled to comment on Joan Walsh’s latest article in Solon entitled “Cornell West’s tragic meltdown”.  Its unfortunate that because Walsh is White her words carry more weight then mine or anyone else Black. On most subjects the myth of White Supremacy wouldn’t be a problem but when the discussion is about Blacks who embrace their Black Race and Culture and reject the myth of White Supremacy and Blacks like West and others who have based their entire lives on the myth then you can see how being a White Supremacist would be problematic in a discussion centered on White Supremacy and Black Self-hatred.

I’m not attacking Joan Walsh or any of the 99.9% of White people who aren’t racists who don’t hate Blacks but who simply would not be able to remain sane if they didn’t justify 450 years of Slavery, Oppression, Discrimination and Racism by believing that Blacks as a condition of our existence are simply socially, culturally, politically and intellectually and yes morally inferior. If not then why the hell else would God let Whites inflict 450 years of tyranny against us? Why would God make us Black if he didn’t’ want Whites to destroy us and be our Masters?

So with that as background what happens when someone does as Barack Obama did and declares his ode to being Black who embraces his Black name his Black wife and family his Black community his Black Pastor and rejects and defies the very myth that is keeping over 90% of America alive and that’s the myth that Whites are the superior race and that Blacks are 2nd class citizens who should be grateful that Whites allow us to serve them?

Whites like Joan Walsh, Micheal Moore, Rachel Maddow  etc. are going to feel angry, slighted, cheated and disrespected. Who is Barack Obama to question the myth that Whites are superior? How dare a Black man look someone White in the eye and have the audacity to suggest that there is any other agenda any other goal or objective that doesn’t have to do with asserting and continuing the myth that Whites are Superior, who does this uppity Negro think he is? Joan Walsh, Micheal Moore, Glen Greenwald, Rachel Maddow? Illinois State Senator, U.S. Senator, President of the Harvard Law Review? I don’t think so.  But yes being White gives you the right to second guess, criticize, bash, berate, doubt and ultimately destroy the President of the United States because he’s Black and 99.9% of all Whites believe the Black Race and Culture to be inferior to the White Race and Culture.  Don’t believe me ask Joan or any White Supremacist what makes them think they are more qualified the the Black President is not his Race? You’ll never get a decent answer, in fact they’ll say, “I have a right to criticize the President[because I’m White and he’s Black]”.

How many times have we heard Joan Walsh or any other White Supremacist argue that its OK to criticize President Obama[because he’s Black]? Who criticizes a President because he’s Black? Where is that written? Is there a Monica Lewinsky? Was there a Watergate break in? Did he lie about WMD’s? No but he’s Black and therefore he MUST be criticized because by doing so we assert the myth that Blacks are inferior and that’s the most important thing. The ability to destroy a Black President supersedes all else. Walsh in her article admits that the President has done everything he said he’d do[everything] but he didn’t go “far enough” he wasn’t “progressive enough” he simply wasn’t White enough in getting it done so they criticize him and help aide racists and threaten to destroy him because as a Negro he needs to be taught who’s really in charge[Whites].

Finally, we have Black idiots like Cornell West and Tavis Smiley who just like Whites but to a lessor extent have based their entire lives on the myth that Whites are superior and Blacks had better bow down to them or else. These Black Poverty Pimps object to a Black President who doesn’t believe that Blacks are poor and helpless in the face of the superior White Gods and as such would all die out without a steady diet of Government cheese because that’s all we poor helpless Black ingrates are good for.

How dare a Black President think that poor helpless inferior Black people can simply move up into the middle class by no longer hating themselves their race  and worshiping Whites as superior. Blacks who believe in the inferiority of the Black race and superiority of the White race refuse to believe it can be that easy.  And before other Blacks look at President Obama and his Black family as an EXAMPLE they must be destroyed. The last thing Black people need to do is to actually stop hating and trying to kill each other and advancing the 450 year myth of our inferiority.


Theron K. Cal is a writer and film maker living in Los Angeles.

(c) 2011 Theron K. Cal ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

MSM & Fox News, Racism, Media Blackout

Real Brother here.

Now was I all over it or what? I was a bit early but one day after I first did this blog about how MSM has an agreement with Fox News to no longer report the truth that Racist opposition to President Obama is based on his Race.  Now we have the NPR incident where someone loses their job for breaking an agreement that all these Idiots would deny exists.  I argue that Fox News being the number one cable news network  has unduly influenced CNN and MSNBC  and even NPR  to cater to Fox’s mostly Racist audience that doesn’t want to hear  anything but negatives and criticizing of arguably the most productive and accomplished President in American history. But the question is raised is there a formal agreement between the MSM and Fox News that in return for some of those Racist viewers the MSM has agreed to squash any reporting on or discussion of Racism as a reason for why so many on the right oppose President  Barack Obama?

Let’s look at the facts; There is no question that ratings drive the cable news business. The fees that advertisers and sponsors pay are based on how many people that are coveted by the advertisers are watching a network at key times during the day or night as it may be. Fox News is the undisputed champion in the ratings battle over CNN and MSNBC and its not even close.  The following snapshot of this weeks ratings can be found here: http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2011/03/08/cable-news-ratings-for-saturday-sunday-march-5-6-2011/84943. So Fox is the ratings leader but that alone is not enough to assume that they would be willing to lend any of their Racist viewers to CNN & MSNBC but wait; What if doing so would allow for Fox to continue to bash the President because of his Race and never have to worry about the competition reporting on it? This would be ideal for Fox because while they may lose a few viewers those viewers will be assured that nobody would ever know the truth as to why Racists oppose a Black President which has far more upside then the loss of viewers. Of course the MSM gets more viewers so they’re happy and as I’ve often pointed out even non Racist Whites benefit from the myth of White superiority that Racists seek to uphold by destroying the Black President.

Further evidence of an agreement between Fox and MSM came after the tragedy in Tuscon. Days after the shooting– eight days to be exact– the President of Fox News Roger Aile’s issued a memo to his staff to “tone it down”.  Shortly after that the MSM went from correctly blaming the Racist anti-Obama rhetoric on Fox to calls for “both sides” to “tone it down”. MSM was apologizing left and right and while Fox hasn’t missed a beat with their calls to “Shoot the Obama Lovin’ Senators in the forehead” the MSM won’t say one word about or against it.

Finally, a causal search of CNN and MSNBC from the start of  2008 through 2010 to March of 2011 will reveal the number of stories about the Racist opposition to the Black President by MSM have gone down  from about 2 stories–and I’m not exaggerating CNN had ONE story with Rick Sanchez since fired from CNN in 09′ during the Health Care debate and a CNN interview with Real Times Bill Maher– to ZERO  with both Networks Blacking out all stories centering on Racism as opposition to the Black President. There is no other way to explain the MSM’s  Blackout of the sole reason why White Racists oppose a Black President and that’s because there is a standing agreement with the most blatantly Racist News Network in U.S. history and the two wannabe Networks that would KILL ” Obama Lovin Senators ” to have FOX’s Racist viewship. I invite your comments and criticisms and I dare you dispute one word of what I’ve said above. Racist opposition to the Black President is based on his Race and shame on our MSM for refusing to report on it.

Theron K. Cal is a Writer, Author and Political Commentator who’s recently released  novel “Temperature Rising” is currently available.

(c) Copyright 2011 Theron K. Cal Presents.