Why Hillary Clinton Deserves The Black Vote

She humbled herself, giving up White Privilege-to not only win-but succeed once in office by continuing Obama’s policies.

by Theron K. Cal aka The Real Brother

Clinton & Obama

ListenLive

“Fifty percent of Whites will vote for the Republican and fifty percent for the Democrat… while Blacks decide who wins” ~Malcolm X

While the above quote is a paraphrase of the iconic Black activists plea to get Blacks to take our vote more seriously-its a refrain that can be echoed today as we seek to determine the course of a Nation dumbfounded by the success of its first African-American(yes he’s Black, sorry there’s no such thing as biracial), President.

Author Michelle Alexander published a piece in the Nation Magazine detailing why she feels Hillary Clinton should not get the Black vote. I beg to differ and write this article to address the points Alexander raised-in making my argument that Hillary has earned our vote and will be the 45th President of the United States baring an unspeakable tragedy.

Democratic politicians making black people feel liked and taken seriously. Doing something concrete to improve the conditions under which most black people live is generally not required. ” ~Michelle Alexander

While I can’t argue-prior to Obama’s election-the above was not true, I will argue that it worked because for as lame as Democratic outreach to Black voters was, it was ten times better than Republican outreach-which was a [big fat]middle finger. As Blacks we don’t want any group to take our votes for granted, but giving our vote to Republicans as reward for hating our guts is much worse.

“…Bill Clinton seemed to get us. When Toni Morrison dubbed him our first black president, we nodded our heads. We had our boy in the White House. Or at least we thought we did.” ~Michelle Alexander

I disagree both with Mrs Alexander & Morrison. The idea that Blacks can only accept Bill Clinton if we think he’s Black is insulting if not asinine. For as much as Black women would want and expect Black men to hate White people for four-hundred and fifty years of Slavery, Racism, Discrimination & Oppression based on our race, we don’t.

If we want to accept and embrace Whites who show a sincere interest in our race and culture it doesn’t mean we think Eminem is Black. Clinton acknowledged aspects of our Culture-including some that would lead to his impeachment-that the brothers admired and we need not apologize or be insulted for that.

Would now be a good time to bring up the fact that what Bill Clinton did had nothing to do with Hillary? Sure she was his wife and yes she was White and I’ll even grant she thinks-as all Whites do-that Blacks are degenerate, inferior and nobody Black will ever be President-if they do somehow luck up and get elected they won’t succeed.

hillary460
Should Hillary lie to Blacks to get our vote?

Alexander goes on to mention Bill Clinton’s Three Strikes legislation and disproportionate sentencing for Black offenders as opposed to Whites committing the same offense. I concede that these policies were supported in speeches by Hillary, who I truly believe supported them wholeheartedly.

That said, Hillary would pay for her beliefs in 2008 when she put them to the test in her battle with then Senator Barack Obama. To argue that she’s the same person who thinks Whites superior and Black men “Super Predators” after being soundly defeated by Obama is to be dishonest.

Hillary was asked by Chris Hayes of MSNBC why she didn’t handle the email server thing better-she knew she was running for President? When she answered, “No, I hadn’t decided whether or not I was running for President”  You could see the smirk on Hayes’ face.

Hayes assumes Hillary knew she was running and is once again being less than honest. A charge, which is at the heart of the fake scandals the White-98% Conservative owned media-is saying is her number one flaw.

I look at it another way. If in fact Hillary believed in the myth of White supremacy and that nobody Black could beat her and become President.  Would she be able to maintain that belief if she wanted to run again-after the Black President who beat her, becomes the most successful in U.S. History?

So yes no question, Hillary contemplated running for President but she’d have to abandon the White supremacist beliefs that cost her in 08′, beliefs that her entire life to this point had been based on.  Giving up White Privilege is not a decision anyone White- especially democratic royalty gives up lightly.

“This time she’s facing a democratic socialist who promises a political revolution that will bring universal healthcare, a living wage, an end to rampant Wall Street greed, and the dismantling of the vast prison state—many of the same goals that Martin Luther King Jr. championed at the end of his life. Even so, black folks are sticking with the Clinton brand.”

This is a meme being played out in our media and it speaks to how insulting White people can be. Just as our embrace of Bill Clinton wasn’t because we thought he was Black, its because he reached out to Blacks when very few Whites and no White Republicans have or do.

That Bernie Sanders is playing on the same myth of White Supremacy that Hillary had to abandon to gain the support of President Obama, is not the same thing as President Obama beating Hillary because she thought she could win simply by being White.

“Yes, but James Earl Ray marched with Dr. King too it doesn’t mean you get to trick Blacks into making you President” ~RB

Just as Black voters found in 2008 that Hillary was lying so too will Black voters find out about Bernie. In his victory speech after his win in New Hampshire he said some amazing things like;

“We have to get big money out of elections…now if you’ll excuse me-I have to raise another $100 million dollars.” ~Bernie Sanders

Or this one: “I’m going to Tax the top 1%, but yes your taxes will go up too” ~Bernie Sanders

The CBO scored Single Payer health care when they scored the Affordable Care Act. Obama submitted Hillary’s, Hillarycare proposal for comparison. The plan-which is being championed by Sanders-has been scored to cost $2 Trillion Dollars in Tax Payer funds(CBO) Bernie’s response? “You’ll save thousands...”

You heard that right, you pay; TWO TRILLION but you save “thousands” sounds like a great plan(not really).

Yes again that’s Bernie’s plan but the Republicans are even worse. Ted Cruz won the Iowa Caucus, in his victory speech said; “Obamacare actually hurts people on the bottom[by encouraging them to get into the middle class].” ~Ted Cruz

“The issue is; should we demand Hillary lie to us to prove to us that she deserves our vote? I say no. I say if she lies she’ll lose again.” ~RB

Alexander spends the rest of her article chronicling how Bill Clinton’s, Whites are Superior Blacks are degenerate & inferior policies hurt Black people-as an argument for why we should accept Bernie lying to us-because he thinks Blacks are inferior Whites are Superior.

I reject the notion that because Hillary is convinced her policies of the past were wrong that she’s less qualified than Bernie-who doesn’t realize his policies have been tried by the first failed 43 White presidents and certainly wouldn’t work in the age of Obama.

Hillary doesn’t have to tell us she knows her husbands policies were wrong, only that she will follow Obama’s policies which corrected those-not only of her husband-but of the Republican presidents trying to take their Country back[to 1850].

Finally, I said in 2008 that Obama would make it look so easy-every White son of a Bush would think they can be President. I also said they don’t realize Obama won because he had a; 1)Better Argument. Wasn’t a, 2) racist or supremacist and he wasn’t a 3)Liar.

We can have a debate as to why someone traumatized by Obama in defeat would be more apt to follow his lead than someone who thinks he’s “corrupt” because certainly he couldn’t have won if he wasn’t.

Sanders rails on the Donor Class and how these banks and Wall Street firms control our elections implying Obama’s on the take and so is Hillary. The facts tell a different story.

In 2008 Obama got twenty percent of his campaign contributions from Banks and Wall Street firms.  As President getting 5.7 Trillion Dollars in principle, interest, fines, fees & penalties. Including but not limited to: $16.65 Billion, Bank of America(bought Country Wide) $13 Billion, J.P. Morgan, $25 Billion, Wells Fargo($300 million to Black homeowners in a settlement with the bank and Obama basher Tavis Smiley). Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, USB, HSBC all were fined(Wall Street Journal).

The argument that taking money from banks and Wall Street resulting in sweet heart deals and no jail time-especially when only $7 Billion was recovered from Bernie Maddoff is a very weak argument.

Alexander concludes her argument suggesting she knows how it all turns out, the superior Whites win and Blacks lose. That we need a revolution such like the one Bernie Sanders offers. I totally disagree.

Shame on us to cynically look at Barack Obama’s rise to power as diminished because no blood was shed to enact the change of power(though the four-thousand Blacks Bush left to drown during Hurricane Katrina played a major part). Does a revolution not count if thousands of people don’t die for the cause?

If the losers of the debate concede they aren’t superior and accept following the policies of the victor is the only path to success does that mean we’ve failed?

The winner of the 2016 election will have the same qualities as Obama with the exception of his race and gender. By understanding the only path to victory-and success once in office-Hillary has proven she not only deserves our vote-she does our vote proud.

Those are my thoughts as usual I invite yours.

 PLEASE: Support Media Supports Hillary #Donate8 Here: Payments By PayPal

Follow me on Twitter:  RBRNet12@Twitter

Watch & Subscribe on YouTube  RBR Network@YouTube

 

©Copyright 2016 RBR Network Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

Michael Eric Dyson Is Wrong

RB ON MIC VII snapshot

LISTEN NOW! RB RadioNework Live Stream 

-Opinion    Tue February 8, 2016

by Theron K. Cal  Managing Editor, RBR Network

I’m not so naive as to not realize Whites can’t stand President Obama because he’s successful, brash and Black. I also realize every White person on this planet and ninety percent of African-Americans believe Whites to be superior.

The notion that racists won’t eventually destroy Obama like they did Dr. King, Malcolm X, JFK and anyone else stood in the way of the lie-that the dumbest race on earth is somehow superior is too hard to resist.

So when I learned Georgetown Professor and MSNBC Commentator, Michael Eric Dyson had a new book out touting how Obama let everyone down by not letting racists destroy him, I not only rolled my eyes I also decided to take him on as I have so many times with Black Idiots who insist on pushing this narrative of White Supremacy.

The name of the book is: “The Black Presidency: Barack Obama and the Politics of Race in America.”

The premise is simple, Black Idiots who only supported Obama because they were certain racists would destroy him leading to riots and protests, proving Whites are superior and Blacks can only pray, didn’t come to fruition and for that Obama let us all down.

In an interview for the book on the website Radio Times Dyson laid out his case;

Not to suggest there’s not a lot of love or to belittle the ridiculous obstructionism from the far right wing. His inability to move anything through Congress but yes, I’d say there was[on race issues] a racial procrastination that’s sad and disappointing”  ~M.E. Dyson

This is when Professor Dyson’s argument begins to teeter. How much more obstructionism did the inept racist Republican Congress offer that wasn’t deflected during the two years after then Senator Obama first announced he was running for President?

To argue the spit balls from the very Idiots he destroyed in the general election were any less debilitating once he became President, is presumptuous at best and absurd at the very least.

Not lost on me is that Dyson-or any other Obama hater-can’t cite one shred of legislation that the President couldn’t get through Congress unless it was a Bill to send everyone Black back to Africa which he didn’t want to get passed in the first place.

 

Dyson & Obama
Dyson: Obama could have done more to help racists destroy him.

The truth is; Blacks like Dyson who believe Whites are superior assume Obama would stomp his feet and pound his fist on the table furious, that superior Whites won’t let him have his way. The thought Obama would simply let racists think they were getting eighty-percent of what they wanted when Obama was getting everything he wanted is lost on these Black fools.

An example? Obama’s first budget in 2010(Bush signed the 2009 Budget in October of 2008). An early proposal had twenty-eight billion dollars in spending cuts over racist nut Bush’s 09′ budget(one-third deficit spending). Racists balked at the cuts-thinking this was too easy-asking the President to make it thirty Billion.

“How bout Thirty-Two Billion In Cuts Fella’s?” ~Barack Obama

Obama added not only will I offer you two billion dollars more in cuts than you asked for, if you pass this budget I’ll turn around and give you the first budget with the $28 Billion in cuts for you to vote down. You can go on Fox and brag about how you voted down my budget.

Oh, you’re still not convinced Professor Dyson? When Libyan leader  Muammar Qaddafi  said, he’d begin slaughtering his own citizens if they didn’t stop protesting that America had elected a Black Genius why couldn’t they?

It was to be an assassination, even though it was labeled a police action that wouldn’t’ need the approval of Congress.  This kind of posturing is acceptable when acts of war are being requested of Congress as to not tip off potential targets.

Complicating matters in Libya was the fact that Congress wasn’t in session-giving racist Republicans the excuse they needed to claim the President hadn’t mentioned a thing to them about taking out Qaddafi and was again acting alone, leading from behind and a Muslim sympathizer who was weak on National Security.

The real story is, Obama had made a deal with each and every member of Congress that if they signed the resolution to attack Libya he wouldn’t say a word when they went on Fox and blasted him for “Not contacting me, acting alone, and being no better than George W. Bush”.

This has been the case since 2009 when Obama wrote off Congress when Ted Kennedy died and racist nut Scott Brown won his seat.

“Obama spoke on race but only to chide Blacks in public never to attack racist Whites killing people because he was Black” ~M.E. Dyson

Understandable that the ninety-percent of Black Idiots who think Whites superior will think the President will get into pissing matches with dumb racists over them being racist. Yet I know that a real brother would never debate racists as to whether or not their hate is justified or waste time asking them to stop hating Blacks.

A racists argument is; “Its OK to hate you because you’re Black and Blacks are degenerate and inferior and nobody Black will ever be President and if someone lucks up and becomes President he’ll fail.” ~Racist Nut

Is that an argument the most successful President in U.S. history-who just happens to be Black-has to make verbally or by his actions? And yes, to the extent that Blacks are perceived by Whites as supporting Obama simply because he’s Black a lil’ bit a Black chiding helps to sell the notion of racial neutrality that’s needed to accomplish the goal.

“[Obama] shed tears for the victims of Newtown…but not one tear for Blacks in Chicago or the people of Flint who he could have visited but didn’t” ~M.E. Dyson

That’s silly, while the people in Newtown were murdered in protest of Obama’s election, the Black on Black uptick in crime in 2012 was directly tied to the fake Fox News Polls that had Romney ahead in the Polls over Obama.

Nobody reported it but Black on Black crime in Chicago was down 80% since Obama’s election. Murders going from 532 to 106 the year of Obama’s historic election. Its ironic since 2012 we haven’t gotten a yearly report from Chicago because Black on Black crime went back down 80% soon as we all found out Fox was lying and Obama was re-elected.

There will be no shedding of tears for Black on Black violent crime going down 80% that would be ridiculous.

“Obama pushed through a Gay & Lesbian agenda but didn’t push through $40 Billion Dollars in Pell Grants or $300 Billion in middle class Tax Cuts or $80 Billion in mortgage relief & $300 million from Wells Fargo for Black victims hurt during the mortgage scandal. Nor did Obama sign the ACA into Law giving Blacks a 50 to 70% discount on their Health Insurance and up to $2 million in catastrophic care coverage”  ~M.E. Dyson 

Actually, Obama did all those things and a whole lot more. The day I criticize this President for walking the walk but not talking it to Fox News is the day I support that Idiot Bernie Sanders. No, just do it(don’t trip Nike its not that serious) and let the history books talk about it.

A final word on the LGBT claim. Obama accepted $2 million dollars in donations from LGBT groups it was less than 2% of the over all monies he raised. Would he really alienate his base for such a small constituency?

Water+crisis+in+Flint

FLINT: Don’t Drink The Water

Flint was/is tragic but the President knew, how did he know? Because he knew what he was really doing and how much he was really frustrating racists who couldn’t lay a glove on him. It was only a matter of time that Democratic States and cities run by Blacks would come under fire.

We saw that when racists prosecuted Mayor Ray Naggin of New Orleans when they targeted Kawme Kirkpatrick in Detroit. Not to suggest there was no wrong doing but yes, they couldn’t get Obama so they went after local & State Govts. run by Blacks.

If the choice is between poor Black cities, States and letting these Idiots take over our Federal Government that’s a no brainer. I’m sure Obama has a plan for helping these local municipalities but we have to take care or our Democracy first.

“No question,[Obama] sees himself as biracial, he’s proud of that but that brings about problems because he’s not subjected to the same racist brutality and Congressmen yelling out “You Lie!” and people putting ape heads on his body or making him out to be the anti-Christ or all other manner of people climbing over the gates of the White House or shooting into the Oval Office…” ~M.E. Dyson

Of course all those things have happened so what in the hell is Dyson talking about? First of all the 2001 Genome Project Study was clear that the RACE of a human child is that of its biological father.

While there is definitely mixed heritage and culture, a human child is but one RACE and one GENDER as determined by its biological father(2001 Genome Project Study). So Obama’s Black and embracing his Black is what he attributes his success too.

I swear I could go on & on all day every day but the flaw in Dyson’s argument is the belief held by ninety-percent of Black Idiots that Whites are superior and as such they are going to destroy Obama its only a matter of time-so let’s lie and say he’s done nothing for Blacks and is insensitive to racism so we can feel better about Selling Out & joining the KLAN.

I’d love to debate the Professor on my show or on one of his. We fool ourselves thinking these lies about how inept Obama was and how he couldn’t do anything because Whites are so superior could become his legacy. If you or I don’t call these Black Idiots out trying to sell these corny ass books who will?

And on that note what racist is gonna buy a negative book about Obama from a so called Black Liberal? What Black person-96% voted for Obama-would buy it? I understand you want to sell your book but making arguments that weak do nothing but sell yourself and America’s greatest President short.

Those are my thoughts, as usual I invite yours.

TKCAL

FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER: @RBRNet12
PATREON ACCT: Patreon/RealBrotherRadio

Please Subscribe @YouTube #DONATE8

 

©Copyright 2016 RBR Network Inc.

 

 

 

ROMNEY’S LIES WON’T STOP

   

 

Real Brother here. Play resumes. In this one I get at this Racist Nut Mitt Romney again for his lying on President Obama. He thinks if he lies on the President he can win the Primary and then claim he never said it. We can’t allow these Racsits to get away with it. MSNBC is being paid by the same Racists who are backing Romney so they won’t be of any help if we want it done we have to do it ourselves. I invite your comments as long as you’re not that Ron Paul Austrian Economics NUT that shit has NEVER been tried and wouldn’t work in a million years in a modern non-Racist society.

TKCAL

 

 

Theron K. Cal is a Writer and Political Commentator who hosts The Real Brother Radio Show weekdays on Blog Talk Radio and U-Stream  http://www.blogtalkradio.com/search/real-brother-radio-show/  http://www.ustream.tv/user/Realbrother0003/videos

© Copyright 2012  RBR INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER, SORRY BRUH

KRAUTHAMMER: GOP bungles payroll tax

House Republicans walked into trap set by Democrats

Real Brother here. 

I’m compelled to answer the editorial from columnist Charles Krauthammer in regards to the recent Payroll Tax Deduction Bill signed on Friday by President Obama.  Its sickening that Republicans are using his editorial as their talking point in order to spin and deflect the damage done to the Party who as of today exists only to destroy America’s Democracy to punish it for electing a black President who doesn’t adhere to their stated policy of racism, white supremacy and black self-hatred.

Krauthammer sets the tone for his editorial which you can read in its entirety here;  http://on.app.com/t8OFU1 by characterizing the two month extension as “…one of the worst pieces of  legislation in years” and then goes on to attempt to make his case suggesting that the two month extension “makes no sense“.  My first thought was if the legislation was that terrible and would have no effect other then to prove how dumb and incompetent a black President is then would the GOP really be trying that hard to prevent it from going foreword?

Next he argues; The National Payroll Reporting Consortium, representing those who process paychecks, said of the two-month extension passed by the Senate just days before the new year: “There is insufficient lead time to accommodate the proposal,”

The above is silly because the tax cut is a continuation of the current tax law so there is no “lead time” needed to do what payroll companies have been doing for three years. Since when do payroll companies make provisions to change tax procedures in anticipation of a law changing? No had the payroll tax expired would have taken more “provisions” then if the payroll tax is merely the same as its been for the last three years.

Krauthammer than goes on to suggest that payroll companies won’t be able to make the adjustment that they wouldn’t have to make for two months but would better be able to do it if they had three months to not make the changes that they wouldn’t have to make because these tax cuts have been in place for the past THREE YEARS!!! He than goes on to suggest by not having to make these changes will cause; “…substantial problems, confusion and costs” Let me repeat that, but not having to change a thing will cause substantial problems, confusion and costs. OK.

What business operates two months at a time? The minimal time horizon for business is the quarter — three months. What genius came up with two? U.S. businesses would have to budget for two-thirds of a one-quarter tax-holiday extension. As if this government has not already heaped enough regulatory impediments and mindless uncertainties upon business.”

The above is silly[borderline stupid] because it assumes that businesses would be budgeting and planning based on and around the expiration of a two-percent payroll tax cut and if that’s not stupid its just plain dumb. No, if the black President pumps 12o Billion into the economy you welcome the deed but no, you don’t base your business on it. No company budgets based on payroll taxes and the suggestion is in a word lame.

As if this government has not already heaped enough regulatory impediments and mindless uncertainties upon business.”

They keep saying that even when it makes no sense. The payroll tax cut doesn’t offer any “regulatory impediments” or give racists mindless uncertainties, what happened to the free market? Krauthammer is suggesting that the  Federal Government give private business an assurance that their potential customers will be a thousand dollars shorter then they’ve been for the last three years so they can plan accordingly. Its stupid. 

He than goes on to suggest that the 0ne-hundred and twenty billion dollar injection into the economy is a campaign “ploy”. I’m reminded of the young racist who wrote in a letter to the LA Times, “Obama just wants to improve the economy so that he can get more votes“.  The notion that doing right by the middle class is something President Obama would only do as a campaign ploy is ludicrous, but it speaks to the pessimism and suspicion that comes with racism. 

When George McGovern campaigned on giving every household $1,000, he was laughed out of town as a shameless panderer. President Barack Obama is doing exactly the same — a one-year tax holiday that hands back about $1,000 per middle-class family — but with a little more subtlety.”

Can you believe that? In the above Krauthammer argues that a thousand dollars to a middle class or working poor family isn’t nothing but “pandering”? It was noted racist and loyal Conservative Donald J. Trump who in his book “Art of the Deal” said; ‘No matter how rich the recipient or how small the check, they always cash it.’ Trump was explaining how just to test it out he’d sometimes include a small check with a proposal or request using the cancelled check as proof that the fat cat got the material. The point being if millionaire and billionaires will cash a twenty dollar check then you damn right a struggling family would cash a thousand dollar one.

Kruthammer tries to make the argument that nobody would hire somebody to accommodate a hundred and twenty billion dollars for two months and he has to be kidding. The Better Business Bureau reports that major retailers plan their entire year around the two months between Thanksgiving and Christmas. Yes there are plenty of businesses that will hire people for two months. And who is he to talk about how many jobs the payroll tax cut will create? He’s the same guy that claims the Stimulus’ created zero jobs  when the CBO says between four and eight million jobs have been created.  I’m surprised he didn’t offer that Obama was creating jobs to “pander” to the unemployed.

This is a $121 billion annual drain on the Treasury that makes a mockery of the Democrats’ reverence for the Social Security trust fund and its inviolability. Obama’s OMB director took Social Security completely off the table in debt-reduction talks under the pretense that Social Security is self-financing. “

This is another lie Conservatives like to tell.  That the Social Security fund is bankrupt and that taking money away from it will hasten its demise and or deprive seniors of benefits. First of all there is over two trillion dollars in the Social Security Fund and there is no entity in the world with more available cash. Second; by law any monies borrowed from that fund must be returned within’ the fiscal year following its removal. Similar to how the Bank Bailout and GM Bailout recoup was returned directly and automatically to the fed bank from which it came.

Finally, Krauthammer argues that stimulus spending doesn’t always result in tax revenues using the false assumption that poor and working class people if handed a thousand dollars will either save and or invest that money. President Obama has debunked that theory with two successful stimulus’ and the GM and TARP bailouts all of which created record tax revenues. The Conservative talking point that the extension of the payroll tax cut is somehow bad for America is an erroneous claim as in this instance what’s bad for racists who oppose the President because he’s black is good for America.

TKCAL

Theron K. Cal is a Writer and Political Commentator who hosts The Real Brother Radio Show weekdays on Blog Talk Radio and U-Stream http://tobtr.com/s/2625061  http://www.ustream.tv/user/Realbrother0003/videos

© Copyright 2011 RBR INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Obama’s America, A Place Divided?

Real Brother here.

It didn’t take much for me to respond to this article by a woman who calls herself “Just A Conservative Girl“.  The claim of the right from the moment President Obama was elected was that his success was dividing the Country between the racists who hate his guts because he’s black and everyone else who thinks the racists are childish and stupid for hating a President because he’s black.

The article is titled “Obama’s America, A Place Divided” you can read it in its entirety here. http://wp.me/pOGat-1L4

Conservative Girl’s blog begins as they all do with a bit of a disclaimer that she would never call President Obama a Communist or a Marxist or any of the other things that her fellow racists routinely call him because she’s certain he can’t be all the things they call him[she’s almost certain he’s not the Anti-Christ]. But she has to admit that she’s totally against President Obama’s “vision” for this Country. How she knows what Obama’s vision is, Conservative Girl won’t tell us but she knows its evil, she just knows it.

Nothing is dumber then how racists– who didn’t vote for President Obama because he’s Black– argue that his election is divisive right before they argue that they are certain his intent is to destroy the Country presumably to prove racists who warned against voting for a black man because he’d destroy the Country clairvoyant. President Obama is smart enough to get elected in spite of racists but he’s dumb enough to enact policies that would give them an excuse to say we told you so. 

Conservative Girl then goes on to call the President a”Socialist”.  I expected to find a logical reasoned explanation that would prove that President Obama is a Socialist but what I got was this;But I have reached a point that it can no longer be denied.  The man is a socialist.  He wasn’t kidding when he said he wanted fundamentally change America (not that I thought he was kidding, I just am surprised by the speed).  He and his minions are doing so much harm to this country, that we are truly reaching a breaking point. ”

Again, Conservative Girl tells us of President Obama’s intentions what he wants to do with no connection to what he’s done. I’ll cut to the chase; Whites who didn’t vote for the President because he was black who were confident that he’d falter realized that they were wrong so they simply made something up that has no basis in reality and attached it to a President who they simply can’t accept because of his race.

Further evidence that President Obama is a Socialist[no you missed nothing, she never offered initial evidence] is that on November 5, 2009 a Muslim man shot up Fort Hood Texas and racists wanted to blame that on President Obama and President Obama’s socialist tendencies wouldn’t allow them to[I know but its her argument not mine]. Apparently not being able to make the  Fort Hood  shooting Obama’s 911 divided the Country.

There are people in this country who feel very strongly about the threats of terrorism in this country.  Who honestly believe that Islam is a danger to our way of life and to the Western world.  By telling us that we can’t call what Hassan did an act of terrorism all they are accomplishing is further fueling that fire with more distrust.

The above quote is so stupid its dumb. Who said that you can’t call domestic terrorism an act of domestic terrorism? Answer, nobody. That President Obama hasn’t declared war on the Islamic religion is causing distrust how, and to who? These are the very white Republicans  who only two percent according to all major exit polls voted for Barack Obama. They don’t “trust” him? No, they hate him because he’s black.

Today Congresswoman Barbara Lee stood up on the floor of the House of Representatives and said that the GOP is trying to deny blacks the right to vote Why?  Because we want people to show ID when they vote...But the simple act of wanting to add voting to that list makes me a racist. Why?

After fifty years of voting rights for blacks all the sudden white racists decide that blacks need ID to vote. The reason ninety year olds don’t need ID to vote is because the people in their polling place know them. As for college students they have ID’s but racists are blocking them from voting because their ID’s reflect their school address and not their home address. In short racism is the only reason why blacks are being targeted for this new poll tax and nobody is dumb enough to buy their nonsense.

Because I want free and fair elections, I am racist.”

No because you hate the President because he’s black and you think the white race is superior, you’re a racist. And it gets dumber; “Here is Obama talking about Capitalism…”

Racists are on this kick about President Obama being against Capitalism since accusing him of being in bed with the banks, Big Pharma and part of the One Percent didn’t work. GDP up twenty-five percent, Wall Street profits up thirty-one percent, corporate profits up forty-six percent and Fed Bank deposits up twenty-eight point seven percent and oh, his re-election campaign is poised to collect a billion dollars in contributions but Obama’s a Socialist who hates capitalism.

What he doesn’t seem to understand is that when the likes of Barney Franks and Chris Dodd meddled in the way banks gave mortgages it is no longer free market or capitalism.  It isn’t capitalism that failed.  It was the government interference in said capitalism that failed. “

The above argument is dumber then her last two. Dodd Frank REGULATED the mortgage banking industry it was after the collapse, a collapse that any credible expert will tell you was the result of Bush policies and racist predatory lending. To try to blame the housing meltdown on President Obama is not only stupid its beyond dumb. And what’s this nonsense that the housing bubble proves that the President hates capitalism?

The balance of Conservative Girls blog post is just as lame. She argues that things were better before the Stimulus which is dumb because it was the Stimulus that created eight million private sector jobs and grew the GDP to its highest level ever. If anything racists are upset that the Stimulus was successful and they are trying to spin it to mean that they have a right to be upset because it didn’t fail like they hoped.

She never gets around to making the link between President Obama’s market manipulations that grew the GDP to its highest level ever and Socialism but that’s not what she was trying to do. What she wanted to do was vent and express her frustration that her racist opposition to President Obama was wrong and stupid from day one.

TKCAL

 

Theron K. Cal is a Writer and Political Commentator who hosts The Real Brother Radio Show weekdays on Blog Talk Radio and U-Stream http://tobtr.com/s/2625061  http://www.ustream.tv/user/Realbrother0003/videos

© Copyright 2011 RBR INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


SORRY TAMMY BALDWIN, U WRONG SIS’

Real Brother Here.

I was moved by a number of people on Twitter who were boasting of someone named Tammy Baldwin who  had supposedly made a compelling and moving argument for Progressivism and while I admit I ignord it at first because I knew it was some Occupy Wall Street Racist or White Supremacist who hates President Obama because he’s black. 

But when the Black Self-hating Sellout married to the White girl Van Jones touted the Baldwin speech I had to click onto the link to see what really goes on. Right off the bat I saw the article was from the Huffington Post the former Progressive site that has been purchased by the racists at AOL Time Warner who have turned it into no less then a daily Newsletter for the Tea Party.

The article written by Amanda Terkel entitled; Tammy Baldwin Delivers Passionate Defense of Progressivism can be read it its entirety here; http://huff.to/tKv7Z3

My problem with the Terkel article as well as Baldwin’s speech is the same problem I have with the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street and with whites in general who seek to mask their racism and white supremacy behind their principals and ideology. The argument that racism and white supreamcy is  a matter of principal is in a word dumb.

Racists and white supremacists who argue racism as principled ideology remind me of Sandusky arguing that pedophilia is OK because he “Loves” children.

In this case Baldwin argues that its white progressives that must lead the way.  “It’s not that we’ve forgotten how to create wealth in this country. It’s that we have allowed that wealth to be concentrated in fewer and fewer hands. And as the distance between top and bottom has widened, the bonds between us have stretched — and broken,” she said according to her prepared remarks, which were provided to The Huffington Post. “[White]Progressives want to restore those bonds.”

Now people who think I’m stupid will argue that Baldwin said nothing about “White Progressives” as oppose to Progressives in general who are ALL WHITE. I would counter by saying she doesn’t have to distinguish between White Progressives and a Black President because the distinction is obvious. Indeed calling themselves the 99 percent is designed to pit White Progressives against the Black President who represents the 1 percent of Americans who would serve as President. 

Still not convinced? Allow me to continue.

Terkel next quotes Baldwin about her “proud progressive tradition“.  Now other then agitating from the outside looking in what “proud tradition” do these white supremacists have? I hope they aren’t trying to lay claim to the Civil Rights Movement? These white hypocrites were nowhere to be found. There is no “proud progressive tradition” all they’ve ever done is take successes like President Obama’s and try to make it their own while stabbing him in the back claiming he’s not progressive enough.

Proof that Baldwin and Turkel in conjunction with the Right Wing Racist Machine are in cahoots comes in a thinly veiled attempt to contrast the Conservative Racist position with that of the White Supremacist Progressives. Terkel takes a seemingly innocuous quote from Baldwin and uses it to insult President Obama. “Our vision cannot be defined on the other side’s terms or on the other side’s turf,

One can read all kinda’ stuff into the above qoute but “alluding to a frustration that has often characterized the progressive base, which gained steam in 2004 by outlining its opposition to the Iraq War and President George W. Bush’s policies.is not among them. It was a young BLACK budding  Senatorial Candidate from Illinois who so articulately expressed opposition to the Wars and Bush’s policies in 2004 and it didn’t have a damn thing to do with Progressivism.

The fact that a Huffington Post reporter would tell the LIE that Obama was ever a hard core Progressive is vital to their argument that he’s unfit to be President. Is Obama a Conservative? Hell no, but he’s not a Progressive in the sense of being a Socialist which is simply another way for racists and white supremacists to hide their racial bias and hatred. Again, white progressives have no record of success and can’t get elected President so they like cry babies seek to destroy President Obama who has advanced more progressive legislation then these white supremacist nuts could ever imagine.

Indeed whenever these Occupy idiots talk policy they simply put Obama’s policies on steroids and call it a day. There is no policy or ideological difference between white progressives and President Obama, there is however a racial divide and that’s why progressives are so angry. Are we really to believe that when a black man was elected President all of the sudden these white nuts noticed inequality? Could there be more of an insult to progress then the notion that a black President fostered inequality? Where have these white hypocrites been for the last 250 years?

The balance of the article is more of the same nonsense about white Progressives being the 99 percent and the black President being the 1 percent and against the 99 percent and then Terkel ended with this line; “If elected, Baldwin would become the first open lesbian in the upper chamber. There it is. The Hillary Supporting White Lesbians are in the 99 percent but the black President isn’t.

Directly below the Terkel article is a video of the Sellout Van Jones[Did I mention he’s married to a White woman?] with the caption “Van Jones says Occupy has to become like the Tea Party“. There it is again. Occupy should be like the Tea Party and hate the President because he’s Black.

TKCAL

 

Theron K. Cal is a Writer and Political Commentator who hosts The Real Brother Radio Show weekdays on Blog Talk Radio and U-Stream http://tobtr.com/s/2625061  http://www.ustream.tv/user/Realbrother0003/videos

© Copyright 2011 RBR INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

DO YOU BELIEVE BEYONCE?

  REAL BROTHER HERE

Black Relationship Politics: “Do You Believe Beyonce?”

As a Real  Brother and one who considers myself a real journalist, I can honestly say that I have never written one  word about Beyonce’ beyond straight news about her awards, achievements, her pregnancy  and the like. To be honest, while I did read a blog post where another Brother questioned Beyonce’s pregnancy and still another questioned whether or not the baby was Jay-Z’s, I had no idea that there was a movement afoot as to whether or not anyone believed in the sincerity of her marriage.

So when I stumbled across Renina [sorry, can’t find her last name] who wrote the blog entitled “Do You Believe Beyonce‘?” I was admittedly curiousAfter reading it I was moved to respond. You can read the entire blog post here: http://shar.es/bLCqV

The premise of the Sista’s piece is that for a black woman to be happy she has to be free and independent of black men only using a black man for his money and for the necessary sperm cells so that she can have a baby. Renina concludes that Beyonce’ isn’t really in love with Jay-Z nor is he in love with her and offers his lack of public affection as proof of this.

I’ve often commented on the ninety percent of black women who seem to  hate black men and the seventy percent of black women who I suspect as lesbian.  I would offer that Renina’s doubt and suspicion in regards to Beyonce’ and Jay Z’s relationship  is consistent with and a manifestation of this ingrained belief by most black  women that the black man and indeed the black race and culture is inferior and therefore incapable and unworthy of successful and fulfilling relationships.

Perhaps it is because I finally listened to Watch the Throne. Or perhaps it is because I have been writing about Beyonce on this blog for what, three years now. Perhaps it is because I am smack dab in the middle of researching Black women’s sexuality. Perhaps it is because I hear Janelle Harris in the back of my head saying that being married with a baby is the way to go because doing it alone alone is too much work.

In the above Renina offers four reasons why she doesn’t believe Beyonce’ and I’d like to address the plausibility of each of them. 1) She listened to Jay Z’s “Watch the Throne” song. My golf buddy for the last five years quipped that there are two people that make life for him worth living; Tiger Woods and Jay-Z. So while I have to accept Renina’s claim that there were lyrics in ONE Jay-Z song that convinced her of his intentions in regards to Beyonce’, I’ve listened to each and every song Jay-Z has ever put out–fifty times– and I can tell you first hand; I draw no such conclusion.

If there’s a running theme throughout Jay Z’s music–and I question whether or not there is– its that women didn’t give him the time of day when he was broke and can’t get enough of him now that he’s rich. That Jay-Z would end up married to Beyonce’ who’s as rich as he is would support my assessment of any theme found in his music more so then a bitter resentful Sista’ convinced that black men are cold, heartless, misogynist animals incapable of compassion. Being a black man myself I can attest to the absurdity of the charge that black men are incapable of loving black women.

2)Writing about Beyonce’ for three years wouldn’t be proof that Beyonce’ and Jay Z’s marriage is a scam like Kim Kadashian and Kris Humphries’ was. I could write about someone for three years too doesn’t mean that I shouldn’t believe their marriage when all I have to go on is the fact that racist and white supremacist reporters hate black men as much as Renina does and as such refuse to print any pictures of tender moments between the two on purpose. I do remember commenting last week on an AP photo were you see only the arm of an unnamed man walking holding hands with a pregnant Beyonce’.

3)Likewise researching black women’s sexuality wouldn’t give anyone special insight into the authenticity of Beyonce’s marriage and assumes that a black woman would marry only for sex or in spite of it which is silly. Forget about Beyonce’ marrying for sex do you really think Jay-Z would have to marry a woman to get sex? Come the hell on? I don’t think there’s anyone alive that would believe that Jay-Z had to marry Beyonce’ to have sex with her.

4)The fourth reason Renina gives for why she’s certain Beyonce’s marriage is a sham is the most illogical. That Janell Harris[I know I’m like you; who the hell is Janell Harris?] had an out of wedlock child and it was difficult to go it alone assumes that Janell Harris and Beyonce’ had the same bank account and support system. The fact that nobody knows who the hell Janell Harris is and Beyonce’ is the biggest star of our generation says otherwise.

And who are we kidding here? Renina doesn’t like black men nor does she believe that black heterosexual relationships are healthy or can make black women “happy” so she wants to caution black women from buying into Beyonce’s marriage even if she did wait until she was rich and famous before she entered into wife and motherhood. The purpose of becoming educated and successful for black women  is so you won’t need a black man and can die alone and miserable right?

In conclusion, while I initially wanted to skip over this topic because it didn’t fit my usual focus on Racism, White Supremacy and Black Self-hatred but after reading, it actually fit perfectly. The election of a positive black role model in the White House sent the enemies of black men and black relationships looking for more creative ways to destroy the black race and using Beyonce’ and Jay-Z’s marriage shows how damn desperate they are. Shame on me and everyone else who took this long to speak out against this self-hating nonsense.

TKCAL

Theron K. Cal is a Writer and Political Commentator who hosts The Real Brother Radio Show weekdays on U-Stream http://www.ustream.tv/user/Realbrother0003/videos

© Copyright 2011 RBR INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

MARC LAMONT HILL, SORRY BRUH

Real Brother here.

 

Its really sad that for someone black to gain access to a white dominated media hell bent on destroying President Obama and restoring the four-hundred years held myth that whites are superior to blacks, is to join in on the Obama bashing parade. Marc Lamont Hill dives into this sleazy irresponsible practice with his latest Philly.Com article entitled; Marc Lamont Hill: Could Cain make black voters turn red?, which you can read in its entirety here; http://www.philly.com/philly/news/columnists/133219243.html

The insulting and absurd premise of Hill’s argument is that blacks are stupid and as such will vote for Herman Cain over President Obama in the 2012 election. A notion that while pleasing to his racist bosses at Fox and insuring him major play on Conservative Media has zero basis in reality even before the recent allegations of sexual harassment of white women is certain to derail and expose the fraud that is the Cain campaign.

“NO LONGER an afterthought or a Ron Paul-like political side show, Herman Cain, the former Godfather Pizza kingpin, has become a legitimate player in the 2012 election.”

If the Sellout Herman Cain has become a legitimate player in the 2012 election then former Los Angeles Dodger Chairman Frank McCord has become a serious owner in the Major Leagues. Cain has about as much chance to become President of the United States as the Obama family pup Bo does.

As absurd as it may seem, and even with a sexual-harassment controversy swirling around him, Herman Cain is the real deal. And the Left should be very afraid.Why? Because black people will actually vote for him. ”

Yes, I’m shaking in my big black boots, where do I “vote” for this insult to the black community,what ballot will his stupid ass be on? I understand Hill’s need to suck up to the racists who he worships as God who pay his salary and who wind him up and aim him in the direction directly towards the edge of the cliff but he’s doing his Masters a disservice if he thinks even they are dumb enough to believe that blacks in any significant numbers would vote for Flava Flav… I mean OJ…I mean Clarence Thomas…I mean Herman Cain.

Given President Obama’s low approval ratings and the uncertain state of the economy, the president’s road to re-election is already going to be difficult. States like Ohio and Pennsylvania, which Obama won in 2008, are in serious peril. Also, in a reversal of 2008’s enthusiasm gap, Republican voters are energized, optimistic and ready to go to the polls, while Democrats appear perfectly willing to stay at home. This problem is only compounded if there’s another black guy on the other side of the ticket.”

The above is false. Conservatives like to float the notion that no matter what the economy is or does that its “bad” because the President is black. While those on the right continue to push the meme that Presidential elections are decided on race and on the economy the empirical data proves that notion is false.  While I don’t doubt that every election in  U.S. history had race as a factor in its outcome only in the 2008′ election were voters faced with a choice between a competent, credible black Candidate and safe white incompetent ones.

As Conservatives remind us of how bad the fifteen percent GDP growth and the five million new private sector jobs and the record Fed Bank deposits and the most robust economy in the history of this Country is. As Conservatives wail against the lowest tax rates and highest spending cuts made by any other President in U.S. history and  falsely characterize it as out of control spending and as raising taxes on the job creators. As the corporate profits rise and the stock market enjoys a thirty-one percent increase in its bottom line all while cutting the National Debt in half, Conservatives speak about the lack of confidence in this President because he’s black.

While I accept that in a failed economy and given the hatred that white racists have for blacks that a black President would have a difficult time being re-elected. What I don’t buy is that lying about the economy and putting up a black buffoon like Herman Cain out there to fool black people into confusing him with the most accomplished President in U.S. history is something that will work. One might as well take a cardboard box and put cheese on it and call it Godfathers Pizza…no wait.

If we’ve learned nothing else from the 2008 elections, the black community is perfectly willing to vote along color lines when the stakes are sufficiently high. The moment it became apparent that Obama was a viable candidate – in other words, after the Iowa Caucus proved that white people would actually vote for him – black people abandoned Team Clinton in order to fulfill their fantasy of a chocolate First Family.”

There is no better example of pandering to Hill’s racist bosses at Fox then the above passage. The notion that whites would vote for President Obama so blacks would abandon Hillary assumes that blacks couldn’t and or wouldn’t vote for President Obama if he were the incumbent President and the no less then eighty-seven percent of Hillary supporters were still unwilling to vote for a black President. Indeed while only two percent of white registered Republicans voted for President Obama, that didn’t prevent ninety-six percent of blacks including black Republicans from supporting the better candidate.

The notion that blacks will vote for Flava Flav if white people will is beyond stupid. For as dumb as we as blacks may be we aren’t that damn dumb that we can’t grasp the concept of white racists and supremacists supporting blacks who only represent their best interests, blacks like Herman Cain. 

Also, although many of us hard-core leftists find Cain’s political ideology to be repugnant, his beliefs are not as outrageous among African-Americans. In many ways, Cain believes the same stuff as most everyday, churchgoing black people. By playing to the black community’s socially conservative politics, particularly around gay marriage and abortion, Cain could easily strip away a crucial 10 percent of Obama’s black voting base.”

The above sums up the balance of Hill’s argument which is whites are superior to blacks and they don’t like Obama because he’s too smart and doesn’t worship whites as superior so blacks better vote for Herman Cain because that’s who whites do like because he’s a black buffoon who will do what the racists want him to do[help the racists destroy the black race and kick us all back into slavery]. Its a faulty and dumb argument because blacks don’t base our voting choices on what white racists want, blacks base our voting choices like everyone else and that’s for what’s in our best interests as blacks. The Sellout Black buffoon with the fetish for white women is not our choice. Sorry.

TKCAL

Theron K. Cal is a Writer and Political Commentator who hosts The Real Brother Radio Show weekdays on U-Stream http://www.ustream.tv/user/Realbrother0003/videos

© Copyright 2011 RBR INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Sorry Rick Banks Bruh, You’re WRONG!!!

 Real Brother here.

Stanford Professor and author Rick Banks has been making a splash with his new book and wildly ridiculous claims that the solution to the problem of black self-hatred and blacks buying into the myth of white genetic superiority is more black self-hatred and more buying into the myth of white genetic superiority. You can find a video of Professor Banks’ argument here;  http://www.aol.com/video/youve-got-rick-banks/517193196?a_dgi=aolshare_twitter

I’d like to take Professor Banks to task for his ridiculously faulty argument as he lays it out in the video linked above. 1)Banks correctly states the problem that blacks are the least likely to marry and that seventy-eight percent of black children are born to and are living with single parents usually their single mother and or her extended family.

This is where Professor Banks’ argument begins to deteriorate into fallacy and nonsense. Banks makes the wild and ridiculous assumption that the ninety percent of black women who are not married to a black man are justified by the inherent and willing inferiority and deficiency of black men. This assumption is asinine because we need only look to the overwhelming marriages of black men to white and Asian women as evidence that dispels the lie that the deficiencies in black men are why black women are justified in not marrying them.

All available data on the two to one number of black men that date and marry outside of the black race shows that a higher level of education as well as a substantially higher income and social status is the chief factor making white and Asian women more likely to marry a black man than a black woman would. Banks’ argument while in part is correctly based on the seventy-percent of black women who reported on the 2000 and 2010 Census that they were single is faulty because he makes the silly assumption that the seventy percent of black women who are single are so because they simply refuse to date outside of the black race.

This reasoning is ridiculous because the seventy-eight percent  of children born to or living with single black women were fathered by in most cases a black man. If black men are so unsuitable for black women then why are these black women having their babies by these black men? The answer is simple and obvious; black women don’t have a problem with black men as much as they do with being married period. Again, seventy-percent of black women reported to the Census that they were single and prefer to stay that way. And let’s be honest, we must factor in the high number of black lesbian women who while still being women; want and do have children but have little more use for black or any man.

Another faulty argument Professor Banks makes is that because some or even disproportionately high numbers of black men were raised by single black man hating black women and as such are incarcerated and or under educated or otherwise deemed unmarriable by black women that this means President Obama and or Professor Banks are also unsuitable for marriage. One of the most tragic notions in the black community is that somebody over there isn’t right so that means all black men aren’t. If indeed black women are judging all black men based on these racist stereotypes advanced by black lesbians and or white racists then shame on us as a society.

Professor Banks concludes that black women can and should  blackmail black men into turning white or into women by forcing their hand by selling out with white and or Asian men. This is the most silly assumption he makes as the hatred of black men by ninety-percent of black women and this belief that whites are superior is a chief factor in why black men and women don’t marry one another. If anything a moratorium on sellout self-hating black behavior is in order as opposed to higher doses of the very hatred that is so much of the problem.

Indeed if the seventy-percent of black women who remain single and or dating or marrying lesbians wouldn’t shock black men into flocking to marry black women then why  would we assume that selling out with white or Asian men would? These games are again much more a part of the problem then they would be a solution to it. I question the very notion that men can simply hit a black woman over the head and drag her into a cave and make her be his wife. Women choose and no amount of trying to trick or force black men on black women who ninety percent of whom simply hate black men will succeed.

While the prescription of more black self-hatred and more blind worship of whites as superior will sell more books and get Professor Banks multiple television appearances at a time when white racists like Pat Buchanan and Rush Limbaugh express their fear that a black family in the White House will erode the myth of white genetic superiority its still highly irresponsible and wrong as a fix for the problems in the black community. I would hope that the publicity that Professor Banks has received can lead to some honest discussion about the riff between black men and women and if that happens then I can’t be mad at the Proffesor. 

TKCAL

Theron K. Cal is a Writer and Political Commentator who hosts The Real Brother Radio Show weekdays on U-Stream http://www.ustream.tv/user/Realbrother0003/videos

© Copyright 2011 RBR INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED