OWILLIS, YOU’RE WRONG BRUH!


Real Brother here.

I read the recent post by the Brother Owillis about how the President has missed opportunities to fail and as such fit the Racist stereotype of the inferior Black man that so many fucking Idiots want to see so bad. You can read his blog piece here: Do Liberals Understand American Politics? http://t.co/PbKIXKS via @owillis 

My response was this: I read Owills’ blog and he was 100% wrong. @MSNBCWatcher @owillis@Shoq@msbellows Continuing his football analogy; If the team is up by 50 points but the other team thinks they’re up by 4 because they’re White and you have the ball at the 50 yard line with 4 seconds left in the half do you really need to throw a Hail Mary Pass in the endzone that if you succeed the Racists will realize that you’re UP? No, its better to let the stupid ass Racist NUTS think they’re ahead and then when the final gun goes off their DUMB White asses activate the Trigger which gives Obama 5 Trillion Dollars to spend on the middle class.
TKCAL                                                                                                                                                                                  

The problem with people like Owills and these White Supremacist Progressives is that they feel uncomfortable with a Black man who embraced his Black Race and Culture and rejects the MYTH of White Supremacy. They’ll dismiss that argument and call me all kinda’ Racists etc. but think about it; how can President Obama be the most successful and accomplished President in U.S. History and yet be so hated and criticized by his own Party? What is it about his methods that makes his success not good enough for people who over 90% still believe Whites are Superior? Answer, nothing.

Chris Matthews said on his show yesterday; ” We need less smarts and more fight, from this President”. Now think about that DUMB ass stupid ass statement; The Black President is “too smart” and doesn’t call the Racists White Honky Crackers and promise to kill their cracker babies? Would Chris Matthews ever suggest that we need to “less smarts” from a White President? Did we not vote for President Obama because he was smart? No but to Whites who are fearful of a “smart” and “empowered” Black citizenry they don’t want the Black President to be that smart because it HURTS the MYTH that Whites are Superior. These White Supremacists support President Obama but they don’t support the END to the MYTH of White Supremacy.

TKCAL

(c) Copyright 2011 Theron K. Cal

All Rights Reserved

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “OWILLIS, YOU’RE WRONG BRUH!

  1. I know this is a duplicate, but my previous try seemed to have gone unnoticed.

    Hello Realbrother,

    I am very interested in presenting my views on racism to you, because I consider your explanation of what it means to be part of the “black community” to be more honest than most.

    Full disclosure (for purposes of this presentation, anyway): I’m white.

    What I would like to offer to defend is the following propositions:

    1. There is no identity that white people can have, that black people cannot – and vice versa.
    2. Racism is a belief that a sense of identity can be found in the color of one’s skin, national origin, or ancestry.
    3. The “KKK” and “Aryan Brotherhood” are groups which find identity in the color of their skin – the most prominent part of their sense of identity being that white people are superior. (An obvious point to make about them, since everyone already knows they hold this view, but one which I consider necessary to make as a balance to propositions #4 – 7).
    4. To the extent that the color of one’s skin is necessary to discuss the issue of racism (in America, anyway), it is necessary to make a distinction between black people and the “black community”.
    5. It is only necessary to make a distinction between black people and the “black community” in discussions of racism because of proposition #1.
    6. By black people, I mean people with sufficient melanin as to make their skin dark.
    7. By “black community”, I mean black people who hold that there is a sense of identity in the color of their skin (which is why the name of this community includes a reference to the color of the skin of those who claim to belong to it).
    8. Not all black people consider themselves to be part of the “black community”.
    9. Since the “black community” finds identity in the color of their skin, their community identity is racist, similar to the “white power” groups who find identity in the color of their skin.
    10. Neither the “white power” groups’ racist identity, nor that of the “black community”, can be attributed to the color of either groups’ skin, because the beliefs that we hold do not come from genetics – and in fact, those that hold that genetics are responsible for the beliefs we hold are themselves making a racist assessment (because each person’s race is a matter of genetics).

    Now, it is important that you know that I see each of these propositions as part of one cohesive ideology about racism – that is, I do not see any contradictions.

    The reason I said that I thought your view was more honest than most, is because most people who consider themselves as part of the “black community” will not acknowledge that they believe white racism is genetic. It is so hard to get them to see that this a necessary part of their ideology because they believe that if you can say that your community has a cultural identity, then it’s just like any other culture and no legitimate culture can be racist. But this depends on the ideology on which your cultural identity is based.

    What I hope to do in discussing racism with you is convince you that there is a more intellectually satisfying explanation for the wealth disparity between “whites” and “people of color”, and that while there were a significant number of white people in America’s past that held people back for racist reasons, these days the disparity has mostly to do with our economic beliefs: Specifically, Marxism vs. free market Capitalism.

    (Not that we have a free market, mind you. There is a lot of Corporatism in America, and that reduces the number of job opportunities for everyone.)

    It is my position that the so-called “minority” groups have been deliberately targeted by Marxists to be used as pawns in their fight against Capitalism. Unfortunately for those Marxists who are well-meaning, they don’t realize that their ideology reduces production and the incentive to trade, and so to the extent that their ideology takes hold in a society, that society will be economically worse off. This is why Marxism – not racism – is the reason for the wealth disparity between “whites” and “people of color”, today.

    Please consider the following video and see if it doesn’t make sense.

    Walter Williams : Good Intentions! (Part 1/3)

    And in this video, notice that American Indians who are free to own property and trade freely, with less entitlements and regulations, do as well as “white people”.

    Stossel Show – The Tragedy Of The Commons! (Part 2/4)

    I would love to introduce you to Austrian Economics. It will change your whole perspective about free markets (to be distinguished from Corporatism).

    Thanks for your time. If you have a video of your own in mind that you would like me to watch and comment on, I will be happy to.

    1. Real Brother here.

      I disagree. Blacks cannot adopt a “White” Identity because Whites have an identity that’s based on 450 years of Slavery, Racism, Oppression and Discrimination based on Race. Blacks don’t have a history that would allow us to think that Whites are Superior. I also disagree with your claim that only Racists think of Whites as Superior. 99.9% of all Whites do and 90% of Blacks do as well. And no philosophy has nothing to do with it. Blacks aren’t Capitalists per say and Racists aren’t Marxists. You believe that Whites are Superior that Corporations are Superior that Marxists are Superior and that’s the very White Supremacy I’m talking about.

      TKCAL

      1. Realbrother,

        Thank you for your response.

        Your argument in support of a racist “White” identity certainly has a compelling component to it. 450 years of oppression of the “Black” race is definitely suggestive of a trend.

        However, your argument is vulnerable to similar reasoning, since one cannot directly infer from one’s actions what are one’s motives. For example – and this is not something I believe, mind you – one could argue from the same information that, rather than “Whites” having a genetic proclivity toward racism, it is “Blacks” that have a proclivity toward Marxism, which, as I argued, is an economically bankrupt philosophy (no pun intended), such that those who attempt to practice it render themselves in need of a provider.

        Again, this is not something I believe, but you can see how the same information you offer in support of your view may be used against it.

        There is also the problem of our thoughts not being a physical thing. They are immaterial – part of our soul. So there is nothing that genetics can do to us to make us hold any given view, racist or otherwise.

        I wasn’t saying that “Blacks” were Capitalists or that racists were Marxists, so I can’t speak to this.

        The reason I don’t believe that “Whites” are superior is because we are all human, and color is an arbitrary distinction; It’s like if someone said that people who wear blue shoes are superior – they have nothing to do with capacity. Just because you have more melanin than me doesn’t mean you can be something I cannot – and vice versa.

        When you say that I think that Corporations are superior, I don’t know to what you are comparing them, and in what way, so I cannot speak to your specific statement.

        I would like to say that I think that government-protected corporations, like government-protected Unions, are both bad things, since government is giving one group of people economic protections at the expense of the other citizens. (And, of course, to the extent that Corporations and Unions are protected by government, by definition they would be superior to other citizens, economically speaking.)

        There is also this great article I’d like to share about how Anti-Trust legislation, contrary to their stated purposes, actually creates monopolies and oligopolies by redefining the term “competition”. It was a crafty move on the part of the Marxists. Here’s the link.

        Anti-trust, Anti-truth
        http://mises.org/daily/436

        With regard to your statement that I think Marxism is superior, I actually think it is inferior to Capitalism. See, only Capitalism, to the extent it is practiced, can grow wealth and is sustainable. And like I noted in reference to the second video, while the Indians do poorly in America, those who are able to practice Capitalism do as well as “Whites”.

        I hope you will continue discussing these issues with me, because I believe it goes beyond the issue of racism.

        Thanks for your time.

        P.S. If you want a really good overview of Austrian Economics, see this article.

        Intervention and Economic Crisis
        http://www.lewrockwell.com/woods/woods129.html

      2. Realbrother,

        I apologize for any inconvenience in posting this particular reply a second time; There appears to be a setting that prevents my comments from being seen by you for your confirmation, on the first attempt. Here is my reply, again.

        Thank you for your response.

        Your argument in support of a racist “White” identity certainly has a compelling component to it. 450 years of oppression of the “Black” race is definitely suggestive of a trend.

        However, your argument is vulnerable to similar reasoning, since one cannot directly infer from one’s actions what are one’s motives. For example – and this is not something I believe, mind you – one could argue from the same information that, rather than “Whites” having a genetic proclivity toward racism, it is “Blacks” that have a proclivity toward Marxism, which, as I argued, is an economically bankrupt philosophy (no pun intended), such that those who attempt to practice it render themselves in need of a provider.

        Again, this is not something I believe, but you can see how the same information you offer in support of your view may be used against it.

        There is also the problem of our thoughts not being a physical thing. They are immaterial – part of our soul. So there is nothing that genetics can do to us to make us hold any given view, racist or otherwise.

        I wasn’t saying that “Blacks” were Capitalists or that racists were Marxists, so I can’t speak to this.

        The reason I don’t believe that “Whites” are superior is because we are all human, and color is an arbitrary distinction; It’s like if someone said that people who wear blue shoes are superior – they have nothing to do with capacity. Just because you have more melanin than me doesn’t mean you can be something I cannot – and vice versa.

        When you say that I think that Corporations are superior, I don’t know to what you are comparing them, and in what way, so I cannot speak to your specific statement.

        I would like to say that I think that government-protected corporations, like government-protected Unions, are both bad things, since government is giving one group of people economic protections at the expense of the other citizens. (And, of course, to the extent that Corporations and Unions are protected by government, by definition they would be superior to other citizens, economically speaking.)

        There is also this great article I’d like to share about how Anti-Trust legislation, contrary to their stated purposes, actually creates monopolies and oligopolies by redefining the term “competition”. It was a crafty move on the part of the Marxists. Here’s the link.

        Anti-trust, Anti-truth
        http://mises.org/daily/436

        With regard to your statement that I think Marxism is superior, I actually think it is inferior to Capitalism. See, only Capitalism, to the extent it is practiced, can grow wealth and is sustainable. And like I noted in reference to the second video, while the Indians do poorly in America, those who are able to practice Capitalism do as well as “Whites”.

        I hope you will continue discussing these issues with me, because I believe it goes beyond the issue of racism.

        Thanks for your time.

        P.S. If you want a really good overview of Austrian Economics, see this article.

        Intervention and Economic Crisis
        http://www.lewrockwell.com/woods/woods129.html

      3. Real Brother here.

        You dismissal of 450 years of Racism and White Supremacy as not being proof of a biological component to Racism is silly because the basis for Racism and White Supremacy is that Blacks are genetically inferior which is stupid as we all know. Also there are Blacks and Asians who don’t inflict Racism on Whites and never have which eliminates any other logical factor. The Blacks are Marxists genetically is again evidence of Whites having a Racist gene as there is no 450 years history of Blacks being Marxists so to suggest as much is just plain STUPID. No by virtue of having White biology, Whites have the ability to HATE other Races based on Race and this ability is genetic. As for the claim that Corporations are Superior you have to believe this or else you wouldn’t be so certain that Obama can’t regulate them?

        TKCAL

  2. Realbrother,

    I didn’t dismiss 450 years of racism, I addressed it directly on two fronts.

    1. The same 450 years of racism can just as easily be used to support an argument saying that, rather than “Whites” being genetically racist, it is “Blacks” that are genetically Marxist, and that it is actually the Marxism that makes them poorer. Again, this is not something I believe – I only offer this response to show that the reasoning on which you base your genetic racism theory is flawed.

    2. Beliefs are not physical things, and therefore cannot be based on genetics.

    As for my devil’s advocate argument that “Blacks” are genetically Marxist being stupid, might I suggest that you are now being dismissive of the “evidence”? It’s the same evidence that you yourself offered: 450 years of race-based oppression. Marxism makes people poorer and in need of providers, and you have 450 years of poor people who happen to be black. Apparently, correlation equals causation to you, so my argument is just as good as yours, right?

    You’re right that this argument is stupid; But it’s stupid for the same reason as is yours.

    The reason I said that government-protected Corporations (and government-protected Unions) are superior is because they are protected by government. Government protects them from failure, and so they stay in business when they ought to fail and be bought out so that new owners can make it productive.

    As for Obama regulating stuff, I don’t know exactly where you wanted to go with that, so if you could help me understand what you meant, I will respond as best I can. I thin what you’re trying to say is that I believe Corporations are superior and so I think they don’t NEED to be regulated. If that’s what you meant, then I can say that is not my position. My position is that ZERO businesses need to be regulated, nor should they be.

    In fact, the reason the economy is doing so bad is not because there’s not enough regulation, but BECAUSE of regulations and other government interventions (especially the use of fiat money, the Fed’s use of quantitative easing, and its artificially low interest rates).

    There is nothing government can do to make the economy better, because the economy is based on millions of consumer-demand-based transactions, and when the government does ANYTHING to try to help, it obscures real consumer supplies and demands. This is how all economic crashes happen, by the way: not because of Capitalism, but because of government distorting the price system.

    1. Real Brother here.

      You are WRONG. Ron Paul is a Racist so certainly any Australian economics untried, untested and as DUMB as hell would fit with his Racist view of the world.

      TKCAL

      1. I don’t know why you think that Ron Paul is racist. If you have some quotes from him that you think are racist, I would like to try to respond to them.

        As for Austrian Economics, it HAS been tried and tested, and has passed the test.

        Here is a video which proves this:

        Why You’ve Never Heard of the Great Depression of 1920 | Thomas E. Woods, Jr.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s